Wikipedia:Peer review/Pop Champagne/archive1

Pop Champagne[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've been working on this article for a few months trying to get it as quality as possible, and I've come to sort of a standstill after scouring all the sources I could find, so I wanted to get outside voices. Ideally I want to try to get this up to GA status if possible, but I don't think it's quite ready for a GA nom yet, so I wanted to get feedback on preparing it for that.

Thanks, HappyWith (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720[edit]

Comments after a quick skim:

The lede is quite short. I suggest expanding this to discuss every major aspect covered in the article's body.
The "Background, recording and composition" section is quite long. Is there a way that this can be split into two sections?
References that are websites should have access dates.
I suggest archiving the sources using IA Bot.

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 01:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]