The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 03:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral and plagiarism free. Hook is cited (AGF on offline source) and interesting. However, the QPQ appears to be a review by Whispyhistory, not the nominator, Philafrenzy. Unless this is a donated QPQ, a new one will have to be supplied. Pamzeis (talk) 06:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
QPQ is ok from me. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
OK, we're good to go! Pamzeis (talk) 06:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)