SpaceX Starbase

Coordinates: 25°59′49″N 97°09′25″W / 25.997°N 97.157°W / 25.997; -97.157
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SpaceX Starbase
Starbase sign with production site in the background
Map
LocationBrownsville, Texas, Cameron County, Texas, United States
Coordinates25°59′15″N 97°11′11″W / 25.98750°N 97.18639°W / 25.98750; -97.18639
Established2014; 10 years ago (2014)
OperatorSpaceX
Launch pad(s)2
OLM-A launch history
Launches3
First launchApril 20, 2023[1]
Last launchMarch 14, 2024
Associated
rockets
OLM-B launch history
StatusUnder construction
Launches0
Associated
rockets

Starbase is an industrial complex for Starship rockets, located near Brownsville, Texas, United States. It has been under construction since the late 2010s by SpaceX, an American aerospace manufacturer. Starbase is composed of a spaceport near the Gulf of Mexico, a production facility at the Boca Chica village, and a small structure test site along the Texas State Highway 4.

When conceptualized, its stated purpose was "to provide SpaceX an exclusive launch site that would allow the company to accommodate its launch manifest and meet tight launch windows."[2] The launch site was originally intended to support launches of the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles as well as "a variety of reusable suborbital launch vehicles",[2] but in early 2018, SpaceX announced a change of plans, stating that the launch site would be used exclusively for SpaceX's next-generation launch vehicle, Starship.[3] Between 2018 and 2020, the site added significant rocket production and test capacity. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk indicated in 2014 that he expected "commercial astronauts, private astronauts, to be departing from South Texas,"[4] and eventually launching spacecraft to Mars from the site.[5]

Between 2012 and 2014, SpaceX considered seven potential locations around the United States for the new commercial launch facility. Generally, for orbital launches an ideal site would have an easterly water overflight path for safety and be located as close to the equator as possible in order to take advantage of the Earth's rotational speed. For much of this period, a parcel of land adjacent to Boca Chica Beach near Brownsville, Texas, was the leading candidate location, during an extended period while the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted an extensive environmental assessment on the use of the Texas location as a launch site. Also during this period, SpaceX began acquiring land in the area, purchasing approximately 41 acres (170,000 m2) and leasing 57 acres (230,000 m2) by July 2014. SpaceX announced in August 2014, that they had selected the location near Brownsville as the location for the new non-governmental launch site,[6] after the final environmental assessment completed and environmental agreements were in place by July 2014.[7][8][9] Integrated Flight Test-1 of Starship made it SpaceX's fourth active launch facility, following three launch locations that are leased from the US government.

SpaceX conducted a groundbreaking ceremony on the new launch facility in September 2014,[10][4] and soil preparation began in October 2015.[11][12] The first tracking antenna was installed in August 2016, and the first propellant tank arrived in July 2018. In late 2018, construction ramped up considerably, and the site saw the fabrication of the first 9 m-diameter (30 ft) prototype test vehicle, Starhopper, which was tested and flown March–August 2019. Through 2021, additional prototype flight vehicles were being built at the facility for higher-altitude tests. By late 2023, over 2,100 full-time employees were working at the site.[13] The development of Starship has resulted in several lawsuits against the FAA and SpaceX from environmental groups.[14][15] Some conservationists have expressed concern over the impact of Starship's development in Boca Chica, Texas on species like the critically endangered Kemp's ridley sea-turtle,[14] nearby wildlife habitats[16] and national-refuge land.[17]

History[edit]

Private discussions between SpaceX and state officials about a private launch site began at least as early as 2011.[18] SpaceX CEO Elon Musk mentioned interest in a private launch site for their commercial launches in a September 2011 speech.[19]

In 2012, Fredrick (Rick) Jenet, director of the Center for Advanced Radio Astronomy (CARA) and an associate professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Texas at Brownsville proposed to install the STARGATE in Boca Chica (initial funding included US$500,000 in seed money provided by the Greater Brownsville Incentives Corporation in October 2012), as part of a package to increase the likelihood of attracting SpaceX to build a launch site in the area.[20][21][22][23][24] The goal was also to have students and the faculty to be hands-on and assist with launches and space exploration, which was viewed as a rare opportunity.[20]

The company announced in August 2014 that they had chosen Texas as the location for their SpaceX South Texas launch site.[6] Site soil work began in 2015 and major construction of facilities began in late-2018, with rocket engine testing and flight testing beginning in 2019.

The name Starbase began to be used more widely by SpaceX after March 2021 when SpaceX had some discussions described as a "casual enquiry" about incorporating a city to be called Starbase,[25][26] and by early 2022, the Starbase moniker for the SpaceX facilities in South Texas had become common.[27] The site has also been called the "Gateway to Mars", including in a sign outside the launch site.[28][29][30][31]

Starbase is also used sometimes to describe the region of the Boca Chica subdelta peninsula surrounding the SpaceX facilities; see Boca Chica (Texas) § "Starbase", Texas. In January 2024, Cameron County and Brownsville officials both passed resolutions requesting the federal government to recognise "Starbase" as an official place name for the area.[32][33]

Launch site selection and environmental assessment[edit]

As early as April 2007, at least five potential locations were publicly known, including "sites in Alaska, California, Florida,[34] Texas and Virginia."[35] In September 2012, it became clear that Georgia and Puerto Rico were also interested in pursuing the new SpaceX commercial spaceport facility.[36] The Camden County, Georgia, Joint Development Authority voted unanimously in November 2012 to "explore developing an aero-spaceport facility" at an Atlantic coastal site to support both horizontal and vertical launch operations.[37] The main Puerto Rico site under consideration was the former Roosevelt Roads Naval Station.[2]: 87  By September 2012, SpaceX was considering seven potential locations around the United States for the new commercial launch pad. Since then, the leading candidate location for the new facility was a parcel of land adjacent to Boca Chica Beach near Brownsville, Texas.[38]

By early 2013, Texas remained the leading candidate for the location of the new SpaceX commercial launch facility, although Florida, Georgia and other locations remained in the running. Legislation was introduced in Texas to enable temporary closure of State beaches during launches, limit liability for noise and other commercial spaceflight risks, as well as considering a package of incentives to encourage SpaceX to locate at Brownsville, Texas.[39][40] 2013 economic estimates showed SpaceX investing approximately US$100 million in the development and construction of the facility[40] A US$15 million incentive package was approved by the Texas Legislature in 2013.[41]

In April 2012, the FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation initiated a Notice of Intent to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement[42] and public hearings on the new launch site, which would be located in Cameron County, Texas. The summary then indicated that the Texas site would support up to 12 commercial launches per year, including two Falcon Heavy launches.[43][44][35] The first public meeting was held in May 2012,[44][45] and the FAA released a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the location in South Texas in April 2013. Public hearings on the draft EIS occurred in Brownsville, followed by a public comment period ending in June 2013.[46][47][48] The draft EIS identified three parcels of land—total of 12.4 acres (5.0 ha)—that would notionally be used for the control center. In addition, SpaceX had leased 56.6 acres (22.9 ha) of land adjacent to the terminus of Texas State Highway 4, 20 acres (8.1 ha) of which would be used to develop the vertical launch area; the remainder would remain open space surrounding the launch facility.[2] In July 2014, the FAA officially issued its Record of Decision concerning the Boca Chica Beach facility, and found that "the proposal by Elon Musk's Space Exploration Technologies would have no significant impact on the environment,"[49] approving the proposal and outlining SpaceX's proposal.[49] The company formally announced selection of the Texas location in August 2014.[6]

In September 2013, the State of Texas General Land Office (GLO) and Cameron County signed an agreement outlining how beach closures would be handled in order to support a future SpaceX launch schedule. The agreement is intended to enable both economic development in Cameron County and protect the public's right to have access to Texas state beaches. Under the 2013 Texas plan, beach closures would be allowed but were not expected to exceed a maximum of 15 hours per closure date, with no more than three scheduled space flights between the Saturday prior to Memorial Day and Labor Day, unless the Texas GLO approves.[48]

In 2019, the FAA completed a reevaluation of the SpaceX facilities in South Texas, and in particular the revised plans away from a commercial spaceport to more of a spaceship yard for building and testing rockets at the facility, as well as flying different rockets—SpaceX Starship and prototype test vehicles—from the site than the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy envisioned in the original 2014 environmental assessment.[50] In May and August 2019, the FAA issued a written report with a decision that a new supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would not be required.[51][52] In May 2021, the FAA issued a written FAQ regarding the FAA's Environmental Review of SpaceX Starship/Super Heavy Operations at the Boca Chica Launch Site.[53]

Throughout 2022, Starship's first integrated flight test was delayed extensively, due to delays in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issuing a license, to allow findings on environmental impact. On June 13, 2022, the FAA announced that Starbase was not creating a significant impact on the environment, yet listed more than 75 actions to be taken before review for an orbital launch license. Some of these actions included a $5,000 contribution to wildlife nonprofits in the area, making sure roadways stay open on certain days of the year, and actions to protect local sea turtle populations.[54]

Land acquisition[edit]

Prior to a final decision on the location of the spaceport, SpaceX began purchasing a number of real estate properties in Cameron County, Texas, beginning in June 2012.[46] By July 2014, SpaceX had purchased approximately 41 acres (170,000 m2) and leased 57 acres (230,000 m2) near Boca Chica Village and Boca Chica Beach[55] through a company named Dogleg Park LLC, a reference to the "dogleg" type of trajectory that rockets launched from Boca Chica will be required to follow.[56]

Prior to May 2013, five lots in the Spanish Dagger Subdivision in Boca Chica Village, adjacent to Highway 4 which leads to the proposed launch site, had been purchased. In May 2013, SpaceX purchased an additional three parcels, adding another 1 acre (4,000 m2),[46] plus four more lots with a total of 1.9 acres (7,700 m2) in July 2013, making a total of 12 SpaceX-purchased lots.[41] In November 2013, SpaceX substantially "increased its land holdings in the Boca Chica Beach area from 12 lots to 72 undeveloped lots" purchased, which encompass a total of approximately 24 acres (97,000 m2), in addition to the 56.5 acres (229,000 m2) leased from private property owners.[47] An additional few acres were purchased late in 2013, raising the SpaceX total "from 72 undeveloped lots to 80 lots totaling about 26 acres."[57] In late 2013, SpaceX completed a replat of 13 lots totaling 8.3 acres (34,000 m2) into a subdivision that they have named "Mars Crossing."[58][59]

In February 2014, they purchased 28 additional lots that surround the proposed complex at Boca Chica Beach, raising the SpaceX-owned land to approximately 36 acres (150,000 m2) in addition to the 56-acre (230,000 m2) lease.[58] SpaceX's investments in Cameron County continued in March 2014, with the purchase of more tracts of land, bringing the total number of lots it owned to 90. Public records showed that the total land area that SpaceX then owned through Dogleg Park LLC was roughly 37 acres (150,000 m2). This is in addition to 56.5 acres (229,000 m2) that SpaceX then had under lease.[60] By September 2014, Dogleg Park completed a replat of lots totaling 49.3 acres (200,000 m2) into a second subdivision, this one named "Launch Site Texas", made up of several parcels of property previously purchased. This is the site of the launch site itself while the launch control facility is planned two miles west in the Mars Crossing subdivision. Dogleg Park had also continued purchasing land in Boca Chica, and by September 2014 owned a total of "87 lots equaling more than 100 acres".[59]

SpaceX has also bought and is modifying several residential properties in Boca Chica Village, but apparently planning to leave them in residential use, about 2 miles (3.2 km) west of the launch site.[61]

In September 2019, SpaceX extended an offer to buy each of the houses in Boca Chica Village for three times the fair market value along with an offer of VIP invitations to future launch events. The 3x offer was said to be "non-negotiable." Homeowners were given two weeks for this particular offer to remain valid.[62]

In January 2024, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department announced a proposal to transfer 43 acres of Boca Chica State Park lands to SpaceX, in exchange for 477 new acres to be added to the Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge.[63][64]

Construction[edit]

Major site construction at SpaceX's launch site in Boca Chica got underway in 2016, with site soil preparation for the launch pad in a process said to take two years, with significant additional soil work and significant construction beginning in late 2018. By September 2019, the site had been "transformed into an operational launch site – outfitted with the ground support equipment needed to support test flights of the methane-fueled Starship vehicles."[65] Lighter construction of fencing and temporary buildings in the control center area had begun in 2014.[59][66]

The Texas launch location was projected in the 2013 draft EIS to include a 20 acres (81,000 m2) vertical launch area and a 12.2 acres (49,000 m2) area for a launch control center and a launch pad directly adjacent to the eastern terminus of Texas State Highway 4.[2] Changes occurred based on actual land SpaceX was able to purchase and replat for the control center and primary spaceship build yard.

SpaceX broke ground on the new launch site in September 2014,[10] but indicated then that the principal work to build the facility was not expected to ramp up until late 2015[4] after the SpaceX launch site development team completed work on Kennedy Space Center Launch Pad 39A, as the same team was expected to manage the work to build the Boca Chica facility. Advance preparation work was expected to commence ahead of that. As of 2014, SpaceX anticipated spending approximately US$100 million over three to four years to build the Texas facility, while the Texas state government expected to spend US$15 million to extend utilities and infrastructure to support the new spaceport.[4] The design phase for the facility was completed by March 2015.[67] In the event, construction was delayed by the destruction of one of SpaceX two Florida launch facilities in a September 2016 rocket explosion, which tied up the launch site design/build team for over a year.

In order to stabilize the waterlogged ground at the coastal site, SpaceX engineers determined that a process known as soil surcharging would be required. For this to happen, some 310,000 cubic yards (240,000 m3) of new soil was trucked to the facility between October 2015 and January 2016.[11][68] In January 2016, following additional soil testing that revealed foundation problems, SpaceX indicated they were not planning to complete construction until 2017, and the first launch from Boca Chica was not expected until late 2018.[12][68][69] In February 2016, SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell stated that construction had been delayed by poor soil stability at the site, and that "two years of dirt work" would be required before SpaceX could build the launch facility, with construction costs expected to be higher than previously estimated.[70] The first phase of the soil stabilization process was completed by May 2016.[71]

Ground tracking station antennas installed at the control center

Two 9 m (30 ft) S-band tracking station antennas were installed at the site in 2016–2017.[72] They were formerly used to track the Space Shuttle during launch and landing[73][74] and made operational as tracking resources for crewed Dragon missions in 2018.

A SpaceX-owned 6.5-acre (26,000 m2) photovoltaic power station was installed on site to provide off-grid electrical power near the control center,[9][75][76] The solar farm was installed by SolarCity in January 2018.

Progress on building the pad had slowed considerably through 2017, much slower than either SpaceX or Texas state officials had expected when it was announced in 2014. Support for SpaceX, however, remained fairly strong amongst Texas public officials.[72] In January 2018, COO Shotwell said the pad might be used for "early vehicle testing" by late 2018 or early 2019 but that additional work would be required after that to make it into a full launch site.[77] SpaceX achieved this new target, with prototype rocket and rocket engine ground testing at Boca Chica starting in March 2019, and suborbital flight tests starting in July 2019.

In late 2018, construction ramped up considerably, and the site saw the development of a large propellant tank farm including a 95,000 gallon horizontal liquid oxygen tank[78] and 80,000 gallon liquid methane tank,[79] a gas flare, more offices, and a small flat square launch pad. The Starhopper prototype was relocated to the pad in March 2019, and first flew in late July 2019.[80]

By September 2019, the facility had been completely transformed into a new phase of an industrial rocket build facility, with workers working multiple shifts and more than five days a week, able to support large rocket ground and flight testing.[65] As of November 2019 the SpaceX South Texas Launch Site crew has been working on a new launch pad for its Starship/Super Heavy rocket; the former launch site has been transformed to an assembly site for the Starship rocket.[81]

On March 7, 2021, it was revealed by Michael Baylor on Twitter that the SpaceX South Texas Launch Site may eventually expand to the south. The expansion could see the addition of two suborbital test stands along with one orbital launch pad code-named Orbital Launch Mount B. The expansion could also include a new landing pad, an expansion to the existing tank farm, a new tank farm situated next to the proposed Orbital Launch Mount B, expanded Suborbital Pad B decking and two integration towers situated to under-construction Orbital Launch Mount A and the proposed Orbital Launch Mount B.[82]

In March 2021, SpaceX received a "Determination of no hazard to air navigation" from the FAA for the 146 m (479 ft) launch tower that SpaceX is building that is intended to support orbital launches.[83] The period of construction shown on the FAA documents was April–July 2021 but the expiration date on the regulatory approval was September 18, 2021.[84]

The launch tower was fully stacked by late July 2021, when a crane lifted the ninth and final large steel section to the top of the tower at the orbital launch site (OLS). The tower is designed to have a set of large arms attached which is used to stack both Super Heavy and the Starship second stage on the adjacent launch mount and, eventually, catch the rocket on return to the launch site as well. There is no separate large crane attached to the top of the tower.[85] The launch mount ("Stage Zero") began construction in July 2020, when the rebar of the deep foundation began to rise above the ground. Soon six large steel circular launch supports were erected[86] which would eventually support the massive weight of the launch table some ten months later. The mount was built to full height on July 31, 2021 with the rollout and craning into place of the 370 t (370,000 kg; 820,000 lb) launch table, which had been custom built at the manufacturing site over the preceding months.[85] Musk has commented that Stage Zero would be all that is necessary to both launch and catch the rocket, and that building it is at least as difficult as the booster or ship.[85] As of August 2, 2021, launch mount and launch tower plumbing, electrical, and ground support equipment connections were yet to be completed. Soon after tests for Starships were paused, production started to ramp up for the first orbital test flight. SpaceX workers started building GSE tanks, cryogenic shells, Starship SN20, and Super Heavy Booster 4. As SN20 was completed, and Booster 4 and SN20 were rolled out to the launch site for a full stack. On August 6, 2021, SN20 was stacked on top of Booster 4 for fit checks and compatibility testing with the tower. SpaceX workers soon took SN20 and Booster 4 back to the production site.[87]

On April 20, 2023, Starbase hosted the first launch of the fully stacked Ship 24/Booster 7. The launch ended in an uncontrolled spin due to ignited propellant leaks in the engine control systems, and the rocket's flight termination system destroyed the vehicle four minutes after launch at 39 km (24 miles) altitude, and did not reach the planned suborbital trajectory.[88] Prior to the launch, Musk had said that if the rocket were to get "far enough away from the launchpad before something goes wrong, then I think I would consider that to be a success."[89]

Operation[edit]

Vertical launch area of the SpaceX Texas facility, from the FAA draft EIS, April 2013
Starhopper

The South Texas Launch Site is SpaceX's fourth active launch facility, and its first private facility. As of 2019, SpaceX leased three US government-owned launch sites: Vandenberg SLC 4 in California, and Cape Canaveral SLC-40 and Kennedy Space Center LC39A both in Florida.

The launch site is in Cameron County, Texas,[39] approximately 17 miles (27 km) east of Brownsville, with launch flyover range over the Gulf of Mexico.[2] The launch site is planned to be optimized for commercial activity, as well as used to fly spacecraft on interplanetary trajectories.[5]

Launches on orbital trajectories from Brownsville will have a constrained flight path, due to the Caribbean Islands as well as the large number of oil platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. SpaceX has stated that they have a good flight path available for the launching of satellites on trajectories toward the commercially valuable geosynchronous orbit.[90]

Although SpaceX initial plans for the Boca Chica launch site were to loft robotic spacecraft to geosynchronous orbits, Elon Musk indicated in September 2014 that "the first person to go to another planet could launch from [the Boca Chica launch site]",[91] but did not indicate which launch vehicle might be used for those launches. In May 2018, Elon Musk clarified that the South Texas launch site would be used exclusively for Starship.[3]

By March 2019, two test articles of Starship were being built, and three by May.[92] The low-altitude, low-velocity Starship test flight rocket was used for initial integrated testing of the Raptor rocket engine with a flight-capable propellant structure, and was slated to also test the newly designed autogenous pressurization system that is replacing traditional helium tank pressurization as well as initial launch and landing algorithms for the much larger 9-metre-diameter (29 ft 6 in) rocket.[93] SpaceX developed their reusable booster technology for the 3-meter-diameter Falcon 9 from 2012 to 2018. The Starhopper prototype was also the platform for the first flight tests of the full-flow staged combustion methalox Raptor engine, where the hopper vehicle was flight tested with a single engine in July/August 2019,[94] but could be fitted with up to three engines to facilitate engine-out tolerance testing.[93]

The launch site has been the main production and testing site of the Starship/Super Heavy system. All Starship vehicles have been constructed here except the Mk2 prototype, which was built in Florida but never completed, and eventually scrapped.[95]

By March 2020, SpaceX had doubled the number of employees onsite for Starship manufacturing, test and operations since January, with over 500 employees working at the site. The employees work in four 12-hour shifts distributed throughout the day, with 4 days on, then 3 off for a given week, followed by 3 days on and 4 off for the next—to enable continuous Starship manufacturing with workers and equipment specialized to each task of serial Starship production.[81] A 1 MW solar farm and a 3.8 MWh battery supplies some of the electricity.[96]

In September 2022, during a first test firing of all six engines of the Starship prototype, scattered hot debris ignited a SpaceX dumpster, and caused a bushfire in the nearby Las Palomas Wildlife Management Area, an environmentally sensitive area, ultimately destroying 68 acres before the fire could be doused.[97][98]

On April 20, 2023, the first Starship Integrated Flight Test was carried out from Starbase.

In May 2023, a few weeks after retiring from NASA, ex-head of human spaceflight Kathy Lueders joined SpaceX to oversee operations at Starbase to "give government customers comfort and confidence that Starship is going to be a *real thing* around which they can base future plans and operations."[99]

On November 11, 2023, SpaceX announced that they were targeting the 17th for their next Starship launch date.[100] They conducted the second integrated flight test on the 18th, but it resulted in the implosion of the Super Heavy booster due to oxygen line clogs leading to engine failures, while excessive oxygen venting forced the Starship upper stage to trigger its self-destruct. The launch infrastructure was deemed to be in good shape afterward.

On March 14, 2024, the third integrated flight test was held, ending in the Super Heavy booster splashing down but at speeds too high to be considered acceptable, and the Starship upper stage disintegrating upon atmospheric re-entry. The launch infrastructure again performed well, and SpaceX had noted their propellant filling processes were much faster by about 20 minutes.

Facilities[edit]

Trucks offloading fuel in the tank farm. The IFT-1 launch vehicle and the integration tower are also visible in the background.
The Ship Quick Disconnect Arm of the launch tower

Launch site[edit]

Location (map)

The launch site is where orbital launching and final testing operations of the Starship spacecraft and Super Heavy boosters occur.

OLM A[edit]

The orbital launch site consists of three main components: the orbital tank farm, OLM A, and OLIT-1.

The orbital tank farm is home to several horizontal tanks, which contain liquid oxygen, nitrogen, and methane, as well as water for other uses during testing and launching operations.

Orbital Launch Mount A (OLM A) is where the booster sits and undergoes its static firing testing campaign. The OLM incorporates systems that provide support to the rocket as well as holding it firmly in place above a massive steel plate with embedded flame deflectors and sound suppression systems in the form of water jets.[101] This steel plate is supplied by a nearby water deluge tank farm that uses compressed gas to propel water to the steel plate under the orbital launch mount.[102] When a launch takes place, the mechanical clamps release to allow the liftoff of the vehicle.

Finally, OLIT-1 provides fuel and electrical connections to the ship through the Ship Quick-Disconnect Arm. In the future, the tower will be responsible for catching Super Heavy with its two large arms as it returns to Earth.

OLM B[edit]

As of May 2024, a second launch tower is planned to be constructed[103] near the former location of the suborbital launch site.[104] The first tower sections arrived on May 14, 2024.[105]

Production site[edit]

Location (map)

Ships and a booster segment with the High Bay and the Mega Bay visible in the background

The production site, also known as the build site, is where all Starship and Super Heavy prototypes are built and assembled.[106]

The production site also houses three bays which are responsible for assembling the final vehicles.[107] The High Bay is where Starship second stages are stacked, while the Mega Bay 2 is where some of them undergo final preparations. Super Heavy boosters, on the other hand, are both built and outfitted with their engines in Mega Bay 1.

The production site also contains, as of 2024, a $100 Million under construction five story corporate office building and accompanying parking deck building.[108] As well as an under construction recreation center and restaurant.[109]

Sanchez site[edit]

The Sanchez site, located within the production site, is where construction of many components for infrastructure take place. For example, as of November 2023, it is used to construct stands that will be used to move vehicles to allow easier installation of Raptor engines on the Super Heavy boosters.[110] Two of those engine installation stands are now inside the first Mega Bay.

The Sanchez Site is also home to the rocket garden, which is where boosters and ships in various stages of production are stored. As of January 2024, the rocket garden also houses the ship engine installation stand, where the Starship spacecraft receive their three Raptor engines and three Raptor Vacuum engines.[citation needed]

The Sanchez site is so named because SpaceX leases it from Sanchez Oil and Gas Corporation, which had previously used it for natural gas extraction.[111]

Massey's Test Site[edit]

Location (map)

The Massey's Test Site is where the majority of SpaceX's design tests take place. The Massey's site was previously the location of the "Massey's Gun Shop and Range", before being sold to SpaceX in 2021.[112] It is the primary location for Ship and Super Heavy cryogenic testing,[113] and is frequently used for testing test-tanks and other test articles in order to improve Starship's design.[114] Since May 2024, it is the sole location of Ship static fire tests.[115]

Impact[edit]

Two large spacecraft next to a v-shaped roof house
Starship SN15 and SN16 juxtaposed with a local tiki bar

The new launch facility was projected in a 2014 study to generate US$85 million of economic activity in the city of Brownsville and eventually generate approximately US$51 million in annual salaries from some 500 jobs projected to be created by 2024.[116]

A local economic development board was created for South Texas in 2014—the Cameron County Space Port Development Corporation (CCSPDC)—in order to facilitate the development of the aerospace industry in Cameron County near Brownsville. The first project for the newly established board is the SpaceX project to develop a launch site at Boca Chica Beach.[117] In May 2015, Cameron County transferred ownership of 25 lots in Boca Chica to CCSPDC, which were stated could be used in the future to develop event parking.[118][needs update]

Local and economic impact[edit]

Among nearby locales, reception to Starship's development has been mixed, especially from cities close to the Starbase spaceport. Proponents of SpaceX's arrival said the company would provide money, education, and job opportunities to the country's poorest areas. Fewer than one-fifth of those 25 or older in the Rio Grande Valley have a bachelor's degree, in comparison to the national average of one-third.[119] The local government has stated that the company boosted the local economy by hiring residents and investing, aiding the three-tenths of the population who live in poverty.[120]

The launch facility was approved for construction two miles from approximately thirty homes, with no indication that this would cause problems for the homeowners. Five years later in 2019, following an FAA re-evaluation of the environmental impact[50] and the issuance of new FAA requirements that residents be asked to voluntarily stay outside their houses during particular tanking and engine ignition tests, SpaceX decided that a couple dozen of these homes were too close to the launch facility over the long term and sought acquisition of these properties.[121][needs update] An attorney with expertise on such situations referred to the timeframe given[clarification needed][122] by SpaceX for homeowners to consider their purchase offer as "aggressive".[123]

In 2021, activist Elias Cantu of the League of United Latin American Citizens said the company encourages Brownsville's gentrification, and fears an ever-increasing property valuation and a risk of low-income residents being pushed out of the neighborhood.[120]

In June 2021, Cameron County District Attorney Luis Saenz threatened to prosecute SpaceX for unauthorized road and beach closures, as well as employing security officers who may not be licensed to carry handguns.[124][125][126] United States Fish and Wildlife Service said that SpaceX had caused 1,000 hours of highway closures in 2019, well above the permitted 300 hours, prompting concerns of economic impacts from the extra 700 hours of road closures.[127]

During the SN8 launch, SpaceX ignored FAA's models indicating that weather conditions could strengthen the shockwave created by rocket explosion and cause damage to nearby homes.[128] SN8 lifted off despite multiple warnings that this would violate the company's launch license.[128] Following the launch, the FAA's Associate Administrator Wayne Monteith commented that SpaceX showed poor process discipline by relying on assumptions, as such call into question the company's safety culture.[128] Members of the United States Congress voiced concerns about the FAA's response. However, the FAA administrator stated that while SpaceX has made several corrections for those violations, the FAA would not approve further flights if SpaceX did not continue to perform those corrections.[129]

A report from The Wall Street Journal in November 2023 found that homeowners, as well as locals in the area, were conflicted with the appearance of Starbase in the vicinity.[130] Some locals stated that they wanted SpaceX to "move on from Cameron County", whereas some locals instead offered a positive view and referred to SpaceX's impact on their economy.[130]

The economic impacts of the spaceport have included an influx of jobs into the area, mostly high-skill, high-wage careers.[131] In addition, The Wall Street Journal found that Musk had plans in place to start a town near SpaceX and Boring Company facilities, dubbed "Snailbrook", wherein its employees would live and work.[132][133] These plans were met with significant backlash and controversy.[134] Additionally, local housing activists had cited concerns about gentrification displacing locals back in May 2022,[135][136][137] with these concerns only resurfacing in light of recent events.[138] The local government has stated that the company boosted the local economy by hiring residents and investing, aiding the three-tenths of the population who live in poverty.[120]

Senator Tammy Duckworth expressed concerns about who will regulate the spaceport, as NASA is not a regulatory agency, and the FAA has limited experience with space travel.[88] As of May 2023, the FAA is overseeing SpaceX's investigation of the April 20 launch and explosion, and had granted one license for that launch only.[88] Whether the space industry will implement plans for Brownsville to become a research center remains unknown.[139]

Environmental reception[edit]

Some residents of Boca Chica Village, Brownsville, and environmental activists criticized the Starship development program, stating that SpaceX had harmed local wildlife, conducted unauthorized test flights along with infrastructure construction, and polluted the area with noise.[140][141] Environmental groups warned that the program threatens wildlife in the area, including 18 vulnerable and endangered species.[142][143][144] A rare beetle species, the Boca Chica flea beetle, is known only from the beachside dune system next to the launchpad.[145][better source needed] The spaceport was approved under the assumption that the Falcon Heavy rocket would launch there, thus creating a large radius where Starship debris can land on, without regulatory compliance.[146] Parts of the wildlife refuge were covered with rocket debris after early failed test launches in 2021.[143][147]

The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) said that Starbase is "surrounded by state parks and national wildlife refuge lands" and include "important habitats for imperiled wildlife" including the critically endangered Kemp's ridley sea-turtle, raising concerns about the impact of Starbase's activities to these habitats and endangered species within. The development of Starship has resulted in several lawsuits against the FAA and SpaceX from environmental groups including the CBD; as of December 2023, these lawsuits are ongoing.[148][149][150] Biologists have raised concerns over the impact of Starbase's noise and light pollution on migratory bird species that use the nearby tidal flats.[151][150] Stephanie Bilodeau, a conservation bird biologist, said that piping plovers and red knots, both threatened species of birds, have "all but disappeared" from the flats after SpaceX began construction of Starbase in 2021. Additionally, in 2021, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employee complained of "unauthorized encroachments and trespass on the refuge" by SpaceX employees.[152][150]

In 2021, some of the early suborbital hop tests ended in large explosions, causing disruption to residents and wildlife reserves. Residents in the village of Boca Chica had to leave the area prior to each launch due to their proximity.[120] The FAA allowed the public to comment until November 1, 2021 on the environmental impact statement draft that they released on September 19, 2021.[153] SpaceX's environmental assessment missed important details about the propellant source. One such example is SpaceX's plan of building a 250-megawatt gas-fired power plant without specifying how it would obtain tens of millions of cubic feet of gas per day. Pat Parenteau, a law professor and senior counsel for the Environmental Advocacy Clinic at Vermont Law School, stated that it was unusual to exclude such details, which could violate the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act.[154] David Newstead, the director of one local environmental group, said that the explosion of SN11 left rocket debris on parts of the wildlife refuge that took three months to clean up.[152] In September 2022 a static-fire test of a Raptor engine by SpaceX caused a 68-acre fire on the protected wildlife reserve, killing wildlife and eventually being contained by firefighters.[155] The blaze occurred in the Las Palomas Wildlife Management Area in the Rio Grande Valley, home to several protected species.[155]

Before the first Integrated Flight Test on April 20, 2023, 27 organizations including the Sierra Club, South Texas Environmental Justice Network, Another Gulf is Possible, Voces Unidas, Trucha, and the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe signed a letter expressing their concerns and opposition to it. They cited gentrification and overpolicing of the area, and disruptions to local access to fishing and native ceremonies, along with high risk of explosive and methane-emitting accidents, among others.[156]

After the launch, which was plagued by engine fire control issues and forced to end in an explosion via self-destruct over the Gulf,[157] a representative of Another Gulf also criticized the launch's noise levels, blasting of particulate matter (later determined to be sand[158][159]) on Port Isabel residents 10 km (6.5 miles) away, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's approval that same day of new liquefied natural gas terminals within close proximity of Port Isabel.[160][161] The launch scattered debris across 385 acres (156 ha) of SpaceX property and Boca Chica State Park, though no debris was found on refuge fee-owned lands. It also started a wildfire that burned 3.5 acres (1.4 ha) of state park land to the south of the pad. A US Fish and Wildlife Service survey found no evidence of dead birds or other wildlife following the launch,[158] [162] though Texas Public Radio reported that a quail's nest was charred.[163]

After the failed first test launch of the Starship stack, residents of the nearby Port Isabel complained of a "dust" covering homes, cars, and streets. This dust reportedly consisted of fine particles of sand and soil that had been kicked up into the atmosphere from the launch of Starship,[159][164] with concerns by environmental groups over further damage to the habitat caused by cleanup efforts.[158] According to Dave Cortez of the Sierra Club environmental advocacy group, several residents complained of broken windows in their businesses and the sand/soil particles covering their homes.[165] CNBC reported that representatives from the Club and the CBD said the blast's particulate ejecta (sand[159][158]) could have negative effects on Port Isabel residents and endangered species' health, and that the blast prevented wildlife biologists from inspecting the area until April 22, 2023.[166]

On May 1, ten days after the launch, the Tribe and four environmental groups including the CBD sued the FAA for allegedly granting the launch license, in the plaintiffs' view, "too early".[167][168][169] SpaceX would later join the FAA as a co-defendant in order to "fight off" the environmental groups' lawsuit over Starship.[170] SpaceX stated the suit could potentially "significantly delay" its Starship program, which in turn would cause "severe injury" to SpaceX's business, the U.S. government, and private customers.[171][172] The suit alleges that the FAA allowed SpaceX to bypass environmental reviews due to Musk's financial and political influence.[149]

SpaceX later built a water deluge system underneath the launch pad from July 5 to July 17, 2023, testing it at full pressure for the first time on July 28. However, SpaceX ignored procedures required by state and federal laws, including specifying the water mix's composition, where it drains into, and how much of it is used, to apply for permits to test the system.[101] On October 19, the FWS surveyed the area around the Boca Chica launch facility,[173] as well as on October 25, 2023, when the water deluge system was taken into account.[174][175]

Spectators of both the IFT-1 and November IFT-2 launches have reportedly caused damage to local habitats in the nearby wildlife reserve, prompting further criticism by environmental groups.[148][149][150] After reports of damage to tidal flats south of the launchpad following IFT-2 in November 2023, the US Fish and Wildlife Service said that they are working with SpaceX "to educate the public on the importance of tidal flat habitat".[150]

Starbase had originally planned to launch Falcon rockets when the original environmental assessment was completed in 2014.[8] The site in 2019 was subsequently used to develop Starship and therefore required a revised environmental assessment.[176] In 2021 Pat Parenteau, a law professor and senior counsel for the Environmental Advocacy Clinic at Vermont Law School, commented on the lack of certain details (such as where SpaceX planned on getting its supply of natural gas) in the FAA's programmatic environmental assessment expressing concerns over potential violations of the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act.[154]

Texas US Senator Ted Cruz has said that the second Starship launch was "after months of delay stemming from bureaucratic red tape from AST, Fish and Wildlife and other agencies injecting themselves into the process” resulting in "asinine delays". FAA associate administrator Kelvin Coleman said that the environmental reviews Senator Cruz referred to were required in order to "ensure compliance with NEPA and related environmental laws" and were being conducted in accordance with US law.[177] Environmental protection groups on the other hand have accused regulatory agencies of not doing enough to protect the environment and wildlife in the area surrounding the launch site.[177]

On February 2, 2024, an appellate ruling was made, reversing a lower court decision allowing beach closures.[178]

Research facilities[edit]

The Brownsville Economic Development Council (BEDC) was building a space tracking facility in Boca Chica Village on a 2.3-acre (9,300 m2) site adjacent to the SpaceX launch control center. The STARGATE tracking facility is a joint project of the BEDC, SpaceX, and the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (formerly the University of Texas at Brownsville at the time the agreement was reached).[59][needs update]

Tourism[edit]

In January 2016, the South Padre Island Convention and Visitors Advisory Board (CVA) recommended that the South Padre Island City Council "proceed with further planning regarding potential SpaceX viewing sites".[179] The spaceport causes beach closures at Boca Chica beach during rocket launches.[180] The closest viewing spots are Rocket Ranch; Isla Blanca Park on South Padre Island; and Port Isabel. Everyday Astronaut warned against crossing the Mexican border because of the dangers of Matamoros, Tamaulipas.[181]

Launches from Starbase in South Texas have attracted SpaceX fans, gathering and taking photos.[182][183] YouTube channels with large followings such as LabPadre or NasaSpaceFlight have been covering Starship's development since 2019, setting up cameras around the launch and production complex and broadcasting 24-hour livestreams.[184]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "NASA chief hails SpaceX's 1st Starship launch despite explosion". Space.com. April 20, 2023. Archived from the original on April 21, 2023. Retrieved April 21, 2023.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Nield, George C.; et al. (Office of Commercial Space Transportation) (April 2014). "Volume I, Executive Summary and Chapters 1–14" (PDF). Draft Environmental Impact Statement: SpaceX Texas Launch Site (Report). Federal Aviation Administration. HQ-0092-K2. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 7, 2013.
  3. ^ a b Gleeson, James; Musk, Elon; et al. (May 10, 2018). "Block 5 Phone Presser". GitHubGist. Archived from the original on August 6, 2018. Retrieved August 2, 2018. Our South Texas launch site will be dedicated to BFR, because we get enough capacity with two launch complexes at Cape Canaveral and one at Vandenberg to handle all of the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy missions.
  4. ^ a b c d Foust, Jeff (September 22, 2014). "SpaceX Breaks Ground on Texas Spaceport". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on September 22, 2014. Retrieved January 14, 2018. Under that development schedule, Musk said, the first launch from the Texas site could take place as soon as late 2016.
  5. ^ a b Clark, Steve (September 27, 2014). "SpaceX chief: Commercial launch sites necessary step to Mars". Brownsville Herald. Archived from the original on May 18, 2017. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
  6. ^ a b c Berger, Eric (August 4, 2014). "Texas, SpaceX announce spaceport deal near Brownsville". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on August 9, 2017. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
  7. ^ "Elon Musk's Futuristic Spaceport Is Coming to Texas". Bloomberg Businessweek. July 16, 2014. Archived from the original on July 12, 2014. Retrieved July 11, 2014.
  8. ^ a b Klotz, Irene (July 11, 2014). "FAA Ruling Clears Path for SpaceX Launch site in Texas". Space News. Archived from the original on July 17, 2014. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  9. ^ a b Perez-Treviño, Emma (July 29, 2014). "SpaceX, BEDC request building permits". Brownsville Herald. Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2014.
  10. ^ a b "SpaceX breaks ground at Boca Chica beach". Brownsville Herald. September 22, 2014. Archived from the original on June 12, 2017. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
  11. ^ a b Perez-Treviño, Emma (October 22, 2015). "Soil headed to Boca Chica for SpaceX". Valley Morning Star. Archived from the original on December 14, 2016. Retrieved October 24, 2015.
  12. ^ a b "Foundation Problems Delay SpaceX Launch". KRGV.com/5news. Rio Grande Valley, Texas. January 18, 2016. Archived from the original on March 18, 2016. Retrieved January 14, 2018. SpaceX's first launch was set for 2017. The company said the launch site won't be complete until 2017. They anticipate their first launch in 2018.
  13. ^ Clark, Steve (December 13, 2023). "Starbase general manager discusses future plans at invite-only Brownsville event". MyRGV.com. Archived from the original on December 17, 2023. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
  14. ^ a b "SpaceX's Texas Site Needs Full Environmental Review, Conservationists Say". Center for Biological Diversity. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  15. ^ "SpaceX sued by environmental groups, again, claiming rockets harm critical Texas bird habitats". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on January 14, 2024. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  16. ^ Leinfelder, Andrea (November 29, 2023). "Spectators of SpaceX rocket may be damaging critical bird habitats in Texas, regulators say". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on February 13, 2024. Retrieved December 24, 2023.
  17. ^ "SpaceX sued by environmental groups, again, claiming rockets harm critical Texas bird habitats". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on January 14, 2024. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
  18. ^ "Texas tries to woo SpaceX on launches". Daily News. February 12, 2014. Archived from the original on February 23, 2014. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
  19. ^ Mark Hamrick, Elon Musk (September 29, 2011). National Press Club: The Future of Human Spaceflight. NPC video repository (video). National Press Club. Event occurs at 32:30. Archived from the original on May 15, 2014. Retrieved March 11, 2014.
  20. ^ a b "STARGATE to launch UTRGV as leader in space exploration research | The University of Texas System". www.utsystem.edu. September 23, 2014. Archived from the original on September 23, 2014. Retrieved February 23, 2024.
  21. ^ Druzin, By Rye (January 20, 2017). "SpaceX leads space exploration renaissance, and jobs, in South Texas". San Antonio Express-News. Archived from the original on July 5, 2022. Retrieved February 23, 2024.
  22. ^ "UTRGV Officials Unveil New STARGATE Technology Center near SpaceX Site". February 23, 2024. Archived from the original on February 23, 2024. Retrieved February 23, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  23. ^ Armendariz, Jacqueline (September 23, 2013). "UT System proposes research partnership with SpaceX in Brownsville". The Monitor. Retrieved October 7, 2014.
  24. ^ "Brownsville's Growing Role In The Modern Space Race". Texas Standard. July 15, 2019. Archived from the original on July 16, 2019. Retrieved February 23, 2024.
  25. ^ "Elon Musk tries to change name of Texas town with a tweet". The Telegraph. March 3, 2021. Archived from the original on April 28, 2021. Retrieved April 28, 2021.
  26. ^ @elonmusk (March 2, 2021). "Creating the city of Starbase, Texas" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  27. ^ Mooney, Justin; Bergin, Chris (February 11, 2022). "Musk outlines Starship progress towards self-sustaining Mars city". NASASpaceFlight. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved February 12, 2022.
  28. ^ "The Gateway to Mars" (PDF). SpaceX. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 4, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  29. ^ Hart, Matthew (December 9, 2021). "SpaceX Previews Its 'Gateway to Mars' Texas Launch Site". Nerdist. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  30. ^ Cantu, Aurora (December 6, 2023). "Gateway to Mars sign in Boca Chica". 92.3 MHz FM – The Ranch. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  31. ^ Killelea, Eric (July 4, 2022). "'It's not going to be as sexy': Boca Chica looks toward a SpaceX future less lofty than it'd hoped". San Antonio Express-News. Hearst Newspapers. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  32. ^ Lingle, Brandon (January 22, 2024). "SpaceX's effort to incorporate its Boca Chica facilities as Starbase, Texas, is gaining momentum". San Antonio Express-News. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  33. ^ Guzmán, Andrea (January 24, 2024). "Elon Musk took over a Texas town. Now he wants to name it". Chron. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  34. ^ Dean, James (April 3, 2013). "Proposed Shiloh launch complex at KSC debated in Volusia". Florida Today. Archived from the original on April 13, 2014. Retrieved April 6, 2013.
  35. ^ a b "Details Emerge on SpaceX's Proposed Texas Launch Site". Space News. April 16, 2012. p. 24. SpaceX is considering multiple potential locations around the country for a new commercial launch pad. ... The Brownsville area is one of the possibilities.
  36. ^ Perez-Treviño, Emma (September 13, 2012). "Sanchez: Texas offering $6M, Florida giving $10M". Brownsville Herald. Retrieved September 16, 2012.[permanent dead link]
  37. ^ Dickson, Terry (November 16, 2012). "Camden County wants to open Georgia's first spaceport". The Florida Times-Union. Archived from the original on November 11, 2017. Retrieved November 11, 2017.
  38. ^ Berger, Eric (February 21, 2023). "Texas is planning to make a huge public investment in space". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  39. ^ a b Foust, Jeff (April 1, 2013). "The great state space race". The Space Review. Archived from the original on February 5, 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2013. In the best-case scenario, he said, SpaceX would start construction of the spaceport next year, and the first launches from the new facility would take place in two to three years.
  40. ^ a b Nelson, Aaron M. (May 5, 2013). "Brownsville leading SpaceX sweepstakes?". MySanAntonio.com. Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved May 6, 2013.
  41. ^ a b Perez-Treviño, Emma (August 15, 2013). "SpaceX buys more land". Valley Morning Star. Retrieved August 17, 2013.[permanent dead link]
  42. ^ "FAA Notice of Intent to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. April 3, 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 29, 2014. Retrieved April 8, 2012.
  43. ^ "SpaceX Proposes New Texas Launch Site". Citizens in Space. April 9, 2012. Archived from the original on May 9, 2013.
  44. ^ a b Martinez, Laura (April 10, 2012). "Brownsville area candidate for spaceport". The Monitor. Archived from the original on April 14, 2012. Retrieved May 12, 2012.
  45. ^ Berger, Eric (May 25, 2012). "Texas reaches out to land spaceport deal with SpaceX". Houston Chronicle. Houston, Texas. Archived from the original on May 28, 2012. Retrieved May 27, 2012.
  46. ^ a b c Perez-Treviño, Emma (June 20, 2013). "SpaceX buys more land here". Valley Morning Star. Retrieved June 25, 2013.[permanent dead link]
  47. ^ a b Perez-Treviño, Emma (November 23, 2013). "SpaceX buys more land in Cameron County". Valley Morning Star. Archived from the original on November 27, 2013. Retrieved November 27, 2013.
  48. ^ a b Martinez, Laura B. (September 19, 2013). "SpaceX beach closure rules set". Brownsville Herald. Brownsville, Texas. Retrieved September 26, 2013.[permanent dead link]
  49. ^ a b Perez-Treviño, Emma (July 9, 2014). "FAA approves SpaceX application to launch rockets from Cameron County beach". The Monitor. Archived from the original on July 9, 2014. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  50. ^ a b Mosher, Dave (September 5, 2019). "New documents reveal SpaceX's plans for launching Mars-rocket prototypes from South Texas". Business Insider. Archived from the original on September 5, 2019. Retrieved September 6, 2019. The new assessment covers SpaceX's shift away from developing a commercial spaceport and confronts its new reality as a skunkworks for Starship.
  51. ^ "Written re-evaluation of the 2014 final environmental impact statement for the Spacex Texas launch site" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. May 21, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 14, 2021. Retrieved September 6, 2019. the FAA has concluded that the issuance of launch licenses and/or experimental permits to SpaceX to conduct Starship tests (wet dress rehearsals, static engine fires, small hops, and medium hops) conforms to the prior environmental documentation, that the data contained in the 2014 EIS remain substantially valid, that there are no significant environmental changes, and that all pertinent conditions and requirements of the prior approval have been met or will be met in the current action. Therefore, the preparation of a supplemental or new environmental document is not necessary.
  52. ^ "Addendum to the 2019 written re-evaluation for Spacex's reusable launch vehicle experimental test program at the Spacex launch site" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. August 21, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 14, 2021. Retrieved September 6, 2019. The proposed experimental test program has progressed to the extent that further operational details can be provided and considered within the context of the 2014 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the SpaceX Texas Launch Site (2014 ElS). This addendum re-evaluates the potential environmental consequences of the updated operational details within the context of the 2014 ElS.
  53. ^ Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the FAA's Environmental Review of SpaceX Starship/Super Heavy Operations at the Boca Chica Launch Site Archived 14 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Federal Aviation Administration, accessed 14 May 2021.
  54. ^ Sheetz, Michael (June 13, 2022). "FAA requires SpaceX to make environmental adjustments to move forward with its Starship program in Texas". CNBC. Archived from the original on June 14, 2022. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
  55. ^ Perez-Treviño, Emma (May 24, 2014). "SpaceX buys land". Valley Morning Star. Retrieved July 16, 2014.[permanent dead link]
  56. ^ Perez-Treviño, Emma (August 19, 2013). "Cameron County closes two streets for SpaceX". Brownsville Herald. Retrieved October 17, 2017.[permanent dead link]
  57. ^ Perez-Treviño, Emma (January 6, 2014). "SpaceX buys more Cameron County land". Brownsville Herald. Retrieved January 7, 2014.[permanent dead link]
  58. ^ a b Perez-Treviño, Emma (February 19, 2014). "SpaceX continues local land purchases". Valley Morning Star. Retrieved February 21, 2014.[permanent dead link]
  59. ^ a b c d Perez-Treviño, Emma (September 25, 2014). "SpaceX makes more moves". Valley Morning Star. Archived from the original on September 27, 2014. Retrieved September 27, 2014.
  60. ^ "SpaceX still buying land". Valley Morning Star.[permanent dead link]
  61. ^ "The New Residents: Renovation planned for house linked to SpaceX". Valley Morning Star. August 29, 2014. Archived from the original on December 24, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2014.
  62. ^ "SpaceX launch pad transforms tiny Texas neighborhood: "Where the hell do I go now?"". CBS News. September 18, 2019. Archived from the original on September 20, 2019. Retrieved September 19, 2019.
  63. ^ Reagan, Mark (January 17, 2024). "TPWD to consider land swap with SpaceX at Boca Chica". MyRGV.com. Retrieved May 9, 2024.
  64. ^ "SpaceX requests 43 acres of Boca Chica State Park from Texas". January 17, 2024. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  65. ^ a b Baylor, Michael (September 21, 2019). "Elon Musk's upcoming Starship presentation to mark 12 months of rapid progress". NASASpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved September 22, 2019. at SpaceX's launch site in Boca Chica, there was not much more than a mound of dirt [in September 2018 but one year later] the mound of dirt has been transformed into an operational launch site – outfitted with the ground support equipment needed to support test flights of the methane-fueled Starship vehicles.
  66. ^ Clark, Steve (February 4, 2015). "SpaceX vendor fairs slated". The Monitor. Archived from the original on February 4, 2015. Retrieved February 4, 2015.
  67. ^ Perez-Treviño, Emma (March 14, 2015). "SpaceX prepping for construction". Valley Morning Star. Archived from the original on March 16, 2015. Retrieved March 16, 2015.
  68. ^ a b Huertas, Tiffany (February 11, 2016). "SpaceX working to stabilize land at rocket launch site". CBS4 ValleyCentral.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2016. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  69. ^ Clark, Stephen (September 6, 2016). "SpaceX may turn to other launch pads when rocket flights resume". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 8, 2016.
  70. ^ Foust, Jeff (February 4, 2014). "SpaceX seeks to accelerate Falcon 9 production and launch rates this year". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on February 9, 2016. Retrieved February 6, 2016.
  71. ^ Huertas, Tiffany (May 18, 2016). "SpaceX construction causing problems for surrounding residents". ValleyCentral.com / KGBT-TV. Archived from the original on June 14, 2016. Retrieved June 14, 2016.
  72. ^ a b Bob Sechler (November 22, 2017). "Progress slow at SpaceX's planned spaceport". WSB-TV 2. Archived from the original on January 6, 2018. Retrieved January 4, 2018.
  73. ^ Clark, Steve (August 13, 2016). "SpaceX moving two giant antennas to Boca Chica". Brownsville Herald. Archived from the original on December 2, 2019.
  74. ^ Pearlman, Robert Z. (August 2, 2011). "NASA Closes Historic Antenna Station That Tracked Every Space Shuttle Launch". Space.com News. Archived from the original on January 19, 2018. Retrieved January 19, 2018.
  75. ^ Perez-Treviño, Emma (August 6, 2015). "Solar project planned for SpaceX". Valley Morning Star. Archived from the original on January 24, 2018. Retrieved September 1, 2015.
  76. ^ Swanner, Nate (August 7, 2014). "SpaceX launch facility goes green, will have solar panel field". Slash Gear. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 18, 2015.
  77. ^ Rumbaugh, Andrea (January 11, 2018). "Aerospace talent in Texas lauded". Houston Chronicle. SpaceX has a rocket engine testing facility in McGregor and is building a launch site in Boca Chica, said Gwynne Shotwell, president and chief operating officer of SpaceX. The latter project, she said, will be ready late this year or early next year for early vehicle testing. SpaceX will then continue working toward making it a launch site.
  78. ^ @BrownsvilleNews (July 11, 2018). "A 95,000 gallon @SpaceX liquid oxygen tank is hauled through Brownsville Wednesday to its final destination at the @SpaceX launch site on Boca Chica Beach. Photos by Miguel Roberts #RGV" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  79. ^ Clark, Steve (November 8, 2018). "Work picks up in South Texas for SpaceX launch projects". Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 14, 2021. Retrieved February 6, 2021.
  80. ^ Burghardt, Thomas (July 25, 2019). "Starhopper successfully conducts debut Boca Chica Hop". NasaSpaceflight.com. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
  81. ^ a b Berger, Eric (March 5, 2020). "Inside Elon Musk's plan to build one Starship a week—and settle Mars". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved March 5, 2020.
  82. ^ Baylor, Michael (March 7, 2021). "Here is the SpaceX Boca Chica launch site construction plan". Twitter. Archived from the original on March 7, 2021. Retrieved March 11, 2021.
  83. ^ "Aeronautical Study No. 2021-ASW-4185-OE : DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION". faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration. March 18, 2021. Archived from the original on May 14, 2021. Retrieved April 8, 2021.
  84. ^ "Form 7460-1 for ASN 2021-ASW-4185-OE : obstruction evaluation". faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration. March 18, 2021. Archived from the original on April 8, 2021. Retrieved April 8, 2021.
  85. ^ a b c Bergin, Chris (August 2, 2021). "Starbase Surge sees SpaceX speed ahead with Booster 4 and Ship 20". NasaSpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on August 2, 2021. Retrieved August 2, 2021.
  86. ^ Navin, Joseph; Kanayama, Lee (August 27, 2020). "Boca work continues as SpaceX marks anniversary of Starhopper's final flight". NasaSpaceFlight.com. Retrieved August 2, 2021.
  87. ^ "Super Heavy Booster 4 Lifted to Orbital Launch Mount". YouTube. September 8, 2021. Archived from the original on April 30, 2023. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  88. ^ a b c "FAA grounds SpaceX's Starship rockets after explosion minutes into launch". Politico. April 20, 2023. Archived from the original on April 30, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  89. ^ Davenport, Christian (April 20, 2023). "SpaceX's Starship lifts off successfully, but explodes in first flight". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 20, 2023.
  90. ^ Gwynne Shotwell (March 21, 2014). Broadcast 2212: Special Edition, interview with Gwynne Shotwell (audio file). The Space Show. Event occurs at 03:00–04:05. 2212. Archived from the original (mp3) on March 22, 2014. Retrieved March 22, 2014. we are threading the needle a bit, both with the islands as well as the oil rigs, but it is still a good flight path to get commercial satellites to GEO.
  91. ^ Solomon, Dan (September 23, 2014). "SpaceX Plans To Send People From Brownsville To Mars in Order To Save Mankind". TexasMonthly. Archived from the original on September 28, 2014. Retrieved September 24, 2014.
  92. ^ Baylor, Michael (May 17, 2019). "SpaceX considering SSTO Starship launches from Pad 39A". NASASpaceFlight. Archived from the original on May 18, 2019. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
  93. ^ a b Gebhardt, Chris (April 3, 2019). "Starhopper conducts Raptor Static Fire tests". NASASpaceFlight. Archived from the original on April 4, 2019. Retrieved March 15, 2020.
  94. ^ Burghardt, Thomas (July 25, 2019). "Starhopper successfully conducts debut Boca Chica Hop". NASASpaceFlight. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved March 15, 2020.
  95. ^ @julia_bergeron (July 22, 2020). "Going, going, almost gone. Progress continues on MK2 today in Cocoa, FL. A flatbed truck entered the facility presumably to haul away more scrap. As of this morning both nosecone sections remain on site" (Tweet). Archived from the original on July 22, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2020 – via Twitter.
  96. ^ "Tesla supplying Power Pack for SpaceX Starbase 8MWh BESS expansion". Energy Storage News. May 5, 2022. Archived from the original on May 5, 2022. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
  97. ^ "Fire at SpaceX launch site burns 68 acres at protected refuge killing wildlife". news.yahoo.com. September 11, 2022. Archived from the original on September 14, 2022. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
  98. ^ "SpaceX Starship Prototype Belches Superhot Debris, Causes Literal Dumpster Fire". Gizmodo. September 9, 2022. Archived from the original on September 16, 2022. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
  99. ^ Sheetz, Michael (May 15, 2023). "SpaceX hires former NASA human spaceflight official Kathy Lueders to help with Starship". CNBC. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
  100. ^ @SpaceX (November 11, 2023). "Starship preparing to launch as early as November 17, pending final regulatory approval → http://spacex.com/launches" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  101. ^ a b Kolodny, Lora (July 28, 2023). "SpaceX hasn't obtained environmental permits for 'flame deflector' system it's testing in Texas". CNBC. Archived from the original on October 7, 2023. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  102. ^ How SpaceX Will Guarantee Its Launch Pad Never Fails Again! [Part 2]. Archived from the original on October 23, 2023. Retrieved October 7, 2023 – via YouTube.
  103. ^ Unveiling SpaceX's Bold Starship Expansion: Full Breakdown!. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024 – via YouTube.
  104. ^ Bergin, Chris (May 10, 2024). "Just a few days after Ship 30 - still in view". X (formerly Twitter). Retrieved May 10, 2024.
  105. ^ SpaceX Starbase Orbital Launch Tower 2 Section Move from Port of Brownsville 4K. Retrieved May 15, 2024 – via www.youtube.com.
  106. ^ Starbase 101: A Tour of the SpaceX Starship Rocket Production and Launch Facilities 2023. Archived from the original on June 25, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2023 – via YouTube.
  107. ^ How Does SpaceX Build Starships at Starbase? From Steel to Starship. Archived from the original on June 23, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2023 – via YouTube.
  108. ^ "SpaceX plans to build a five-level Starbase office in South Texas". Dallas News. February 14, 2024. Retrieved April 16, 2024.
  109. ^ Lopez, Victoria. "SpaceX's multi-million dollar South TX city adds sushi, rec space". MySA. Retrieved April 18, 2024.
  110. ^ Next Ship Prepped for Testing! Starbase Flyover Update 18. Archived from the original on October 11, 2023. Retrieved October 7, 2023 – via YouTube.
  111. ^ Lingle, Brandon (May 27, 2021). "SpaceX battling oil company over land". MySA. Archived from the original on December 29, 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2023.
  112. ^ Moreno, Gaby (June 14, 2021). "Massey's Gun Shop and Range sell property to SpaceX". KVEO-TV. Archived from the original on December 29, 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2023.
  113. ^ Starbase Weekly, Ep.115: NEW Static Fire Stand Testing - Ship 26 At Massey's!. Retrieved May 11, 2024 – via www.youtube.com.
  114. ^ Starbase Isn't Slowing Down! | SpaceX Starbase Update. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved September 27, 2023 – via YouTube.
  115. ^ Starbase Weekly, Ep.115: NEW Static Fire Stand Testing - Ship 26 At Massey's!. Retrieved May 11, 2024 – via www.youtube.com.
  116. ^ Jervis, Rick (October 6, 2014). "Texas border town to become next Cape Canaveral". USA Today. Archived from the original on October 15, 2014. Retrieved November 17, 2014.
  117. ^ Long, Gary (July 30, 2014). "Board meets regarding SpaceX project". Brownsville Herald. Brownsville, Texas. Retrieved July 31, 2014.[permanent dead link]
  118. ^ Perez-Treviño, Emma (May 10, 2015). "Expanding the future". Valley Morning Star. Retrieved May 14, 2015.[permanent dead link]
  119. ^ Fouriezos, Nick (March 9, 2022). "SpaceX launches rockets from one of America's poorest areas. Will Elon Musk bring prosperity?". USA Today. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved March 10, 2022.
  120. ^ a b c d Sandoval, Edgar; Webner, Richard (May 24, 2021). "A Serene Shore Resort, Except for the SpaceX 'Ball of Fire'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 1, 2022. Retrieved March 31, 2022.
  121. ^ Flahive, Paul (September 26, 2019). "SpaceX Squares Off Against Homeowners Near Texas Launch Facility". All Things Considered. National Public Radio. Archived from the original on September 29, 2019. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  122. ^ ""Great Job": ISRO On Historic NASA, SpaceX Mission". The Indian Hawk. June 2020. Archived from the original on July 4, 2020. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  123. ^ Masunaga, Samantha (October 1, 2019). "To reach Mars, SpaceX is trying to buy up a tiny Texas community". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 6, 2019. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  124. ^ Wattles, Jackie (June 17, 2021). "Texas authorities threaten SpaceX with legal action over beach closures, private security". CNN Business. Archived from the original on August 13, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  125. ^ De La Garza, Erik (June 26, 2021). "Threatened With Prosecution, SpaceX Defends Its Activities in South Texas". Courthouse News Service. Archived from the original on July 2, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  126. ^ Martinez, Laura B. (June 15, 2021). "Cameron County DA: SpaceX may be violating Texas law". MyRGV.com. Archived from the original on June 25, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  127. ^ "SpaceX launch site brings controversy to Texas town". www.cbsnews.com. August 17, 2021. Archived from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  128. ^ a b c Roulette, Joey (June 15, 2021). "SpaceX ignored last-minute warnings from the FAA before December Starship launch". The Verge. Archived from the original on October 6, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  129. ^ "Congress raises concerns about FAA's handling of Starship launch license violation". SpaceNews. March 29, 2021. Archived from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  130. ^ a b Maidenberg, Micah (November 26, 2023). "Humanity's Future or an Unwelcome Interloper: SpaceX's Starbase Transforms a Corner of Texas". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
  131. ^ Lowry, Willy (June 29, 2022). "On the cusp of history: a small Texas city adapts to life with Elon Musk and SpaceX". The National. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  132. ^ Grind, Kirsten; Elliot, Rebecca; Mann, Ted; Bykowicz, Julie (March 9, 2023). "Elon Musk Is Planning a Texas Utopia—His Own Town". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  133. ^ Duffy, Clare (March 9, 2023). "The Wall Street Journal: Elon Musk is planning to build his own town". CNN. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  134. ^ Koren, Marina (April 27, 2023). "The Messy Reality of Elon Musk's Space City". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  135. ^ Davila, Dave (May 13, 2022). "Housing costs skyrocket as SpaceX expands in Texas city". NPR. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  136. ^ Sheridan, Erin (May 24, 2022). Jimenez, Freddy; Ramirez, Josue (eds.). "The Fine Print: Exploring Musk's Impact, Local Leaders' Complacency, and the Community's Struggle". Trucha RGV. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  137. ^ Duffy, Kate (May 22, 2021). "SpaceX is causing a rift between Brownsville residents. Some say it's shattering the lives of locals but others are welcoming the economic boom it's created". Business Insider. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  138. ^ Rose, Steve (April 18, 2023). "Is Elon Musk creating a utopian city? The hellish, heavenly history of company towns". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  139. ^ "'It's Not Going To Be as Sexy': Boca Chica Looks Toward a SpaceX Future Less Lofty Than it'd Hoped". Aviation Pros. July 5, 2022. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  140. ^ Sheetz, Michael (July 14, 2021). "FAA warns SpaceX that massive Starship launch tower in Texas is unapproved". CNBC. Archived from the original on September 4, 2021. Retrieved September 24, 2021.
  141. ^ Koren, Marina (February 11, 2020). "Why SpaceX Wants a Tiny Texas Neighborhood So Badly". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved September 24, 2021.
  142. ^ Wray, Dianna (September 5, 2021). "Elon Musk's SpaceX launch site threatens wildlife, Texas environmental groups say". The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 8, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  143. ^ a b Wray, Dianna (September 5, 2021). "Elon Musk's SpaceX launch site threatens wildlife, Texas environmental groups say". The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 8, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  144. ^ De La Garza, Erik (July 28, 2021). "As SpaceX races to expand launch site, concern grows for wildlife habitats in South Texas". Courthouse News. Archived from the original on September 2, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  145. ^ "Species Chaetocnema rileyi". bugguide.net. Archived from the original on February 11, 2022. Retrieved February 11, 2022.
  146. ^ "SpaceX's monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel". The Economist. February 19, 2022. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on March 13, 2022. Retrieved March 11, 2022.
  147. ^ De La Rosa, Pablo (May 13, 2021). "As SpaceX Ramps Up Activity In The Rio Grande Valley, Local Concerns Grow". TPR. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  148. ^ a b "SpaceX's Texas Site Needs Full Environmental Review, Conservationists Say". Center for Biological Diversity. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  149. ^ a b c "SpaceX sued by environmental groups, again, claiming rockets harm critical Texas bird habitats". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on January 14, 2024. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  150. ^ a b c d e Leinfelder, Andrea (November 29, 2023). "Spectators of SpaceX rocket may be damaging critical bird habitats in Texas, regulators say". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on February 13, 2024. Retrieved December 24, 2023.
  151. ^ Burnett, John (June 21, 2021). "SpaceX's New Rocket Factory Is Making Its Texas Neighbors Mad". NPR. Archived from the original on September 21, 2021. Retrieved September 24, 2021.
  152. ^ a b "SpaceX launch site brings controversy to Texas town". CBS News. August 17, 2021. Archived from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved October 13, 2021.
  153. ^ Shepardson, David (September 30, 2021). "U.S. extends environmental review for SpaceX program in Texas". Reuters. Archived from the original on October 1, 2021. Retrieved October 4, 2021.
  154. ^ a b "The mystery of Elon Musk's missing gas". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  155. ^ a b "Fire at SpaceX launch site burns 68 acres at protected refuge killing wildlife". Yahoo News. September 11, 2022. Archived from the original on January 12, 2024. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
  156. ^ "Press Statement: Rio Grande Valley Community React Ahead of SpaceX Rocket Launch Blast on the South Texas Coastline" (PDF). Sierra Club. April 19, 2023. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  157. ^ Clark, Stephen (September 8, 2023). "FAA says SpaceX has more to do before Starship can fly again". Archived from the original on September 8, 2023. Retrieved September 8, 2023.
  158. ^ a b c d Wattles, Jackie; Nilsen, Ella (May 1, 2023). "Environmental groups sue FAA for SpaceX launch that exploded in April". CNN. Archived from the original on January 12, 2024. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
  159. ^ a b c Leinfelder, Andrea (August 2, 2023). "SpaceX Starship sprinkled South Texas with mystery material. Here's what it was". Archived from the original on September 2, 2023. Retrieved October 4, 2023.
  160. ^ Albeck-Ripka, Livia (April 21, 2023). "SpaceX's Starship Kicked Up a Dust Cloud, Leaving Texans With a Mess". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 21, 2023. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  161. ^ ""Colonizing Our Community": Elon Musk's SpaceX Rocket Explodes in Texas as Feds OK New LNG Projects". Democracy Now!. April 21, 2023. Archived from the original on April 21, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  162. ^ Grush, Loren; Hull, Dana (April 26, 2023). "SpaceX's Starship Launch Sparked Fire on State Park Land". Bloomberg News. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  163. ^ Davila, Gaige (April 27, 2023). "SpaceX is grounded after rocket explosion caused extensive environmental damage". Texas Public Radio. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  164. ^ Cohen, Rebecca; Panella, Chris. "SpaceX's Starship launch kicked up soil and sand that rained down on a nearby beachside town 5 miles away". Business Insider. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 24, 2023.
  165. ^ Turner, Ben (April 25, 2023). "Disastrous SpaceX launch under federal investigation after raining potentially hazardous debris on homes and beaches". livescience.com. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 24, 2023.
  166. ^ Kolodny, Lora (April 24, 2023). "SpaceX Starship explosion spread particulate matter for miles". CNBC. Archived from the original on April 25, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  167. ^ Center for Biological Diversity et al. v. Federal Aviation Administration (D.C. Cir. 2023), Text.
  168. ^ Kolodny, Lora (May 1, 2023). "FAA sued over SpaceX Starship launch program following April explosion". CNBC – via NBC News.
  169. ^ Gorman, Steve (May 1, 2023). "Environmentalists sue FAA over SpaceX launch license for Texas". Reuters. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  170. ^ Wall, Mike (May 23, 2023). "SpaceX joining FAA to fight environmental groups' Starship lawsuit: report". Space.com. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  171. ^ Killelea, Eric (May 23, 2023). "SpaceX joins FAA as defendant in lawsuit over private space company's launch from South Texas". San Antonio Express-News. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  172. ^ Sheetz, Michael; Kolodny, Lora (May 22, 2023). "SpaceX set to join FAA to fight environmental lawsuit that could delay Starship work". CNBC. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  173. ^ LabPadre Space (October 19, 2023). "LabPadre Space on X: "Fish and Wildlife Service is surveying the area around the Launch Site. Come tune in and watch live"". Twitter. Archived from the original on October 19, 2023. Retrieved October 19, 2023.
  174. ^ "twitter.com/nasaspaceflight/status/1717163473400926410". X (formerly Twitter). Retrieved October 25, 2023.
  175. ^ Dvorsky, George (October 27, 2023). "Review of SpaceX Starship's Water Deluge System Critical to Next Launch". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 30, 2023.
  176. ^ Kramer, Anna (September 7, 2021). "SpaceX's launch site may be a threat to the environment". Protocol.com. Archived from the original on December 1, 2021. Retrieved March 31, 2022.
  177. ^ a b Foust, Jeff (December 15, 2023). "Federal agencies caught in environmental crossfire over Starship launches". SpaceNews. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
  178. ^ Lingle, Brandon (February 2, 2024). "Environmental, Native groups win appeal in suit regarding SpaceX beach closures". San-Antonio Express News. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
  179. ^ Kunkle, Abbey (January 15, 2016). "City moves forward with viewing facility". Port Isabel-South Padre Press. Archived from the original on January 20, 2016. Retrieved January 25, 2016.
  180. ^ "SpaceX". Cameron County. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  181. ^ DeSisto, Austin (April 4, 2023). "How To Visit Starbase". Everyday Astronaut. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  182. ^ Lingle, Brandon (November 17, 2023). "'Bigger than Woodstock': SpaceX fans congregate in South Texas to watch, wait for Starship launch". San Antonio Express-News. Archived from the original on December 23, 2023. Retrieved December 23, 2023.
  183. ^ Dinner, Josh (November 17, 2023). "These SpaceX fans say they'll stay after 1-day Starship launch delay to Saturday". Space.com. Archived from the original on December 23, 2023. Retrieved December 23, 2023.
  184. ^ Grush, Loren (September 13, 2022). "Encounters with SpaceX fans who uprooted their lives and moved to Starbase". The Verge. Archived from the original on December 23, 2023. Retrieved December 23, 2023.

External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to SpaceX Starbase.

25°59′49″N 97°09′25″W / 25.997°N 97.157°W / 25.997; -97.157

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SpaceX_Starbase&oldid=1223952394"