Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck

Coordinates: 37°44′11″N 0°41′33″W / 37.73639°N 0.69250°W / 37.73639; -0.69250
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck
Elephant tusks from the Phoenician wreck of the Bajo de la Campana
Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck is located in Spain
Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck
Shown within Spain
LocationOff the coast of La Manga del Mar Menor
RegionMurcia, Spain
Coordinates37°44′11″N 0°41′33″W / 37.73639°N 0.69250°W / 37.73639; -0.69250
Altitude−16 m (−52 ft)
TypeSite of a sunken ship
Length20 m (66 ft)
Width20 m (66 ft)
History
BuilderPhoenicians
Founded7th century BC
AbandonedSank late 7th century BC
PeriodsIron Age
Associated withCrew of the merchant vessel
Site notes
Discovered1958
Excavation datesExcavation dives 2007 to 2011
ArchaeologistsMark Polzer and Juan Piñedo Reyes, directors[1]
ConditionConservation, sampling and study are ongoing
OwnershipSpain

The Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck is a seventh-century-BC shipwreck of a Phoenician trade ship found at Bajo de la Campana, a submerged rock reef near Cartagena, Spain. This shipwreck was accidentally discovered in the 1950s. It is the earliest Phoenician shipwreck to date to undergo an archaeological excavation. Over the course of four field seasons, researchers conducted almost 4,000 dives and over 300 hours of exploration. The sunken ship spilled its cargo in and around an underwater cave at the edge of the Bajo reef. Among the artifacts recovered were fragments of the ship's hull, along with terracotta vessels, including amphoras, bowls, and plates. Among the cargo were elephant ivory tusks, indicating Phoenician trade connections with regions where elephants were native. Additionally, the discovery of tin ingots, copper ingots, and galena nuggets suggests the ship's involvement in long-distance trade networks. The cargo contained also pine cones, double-sided wooden combs, amber nodules from the Baltic, and various raw materials such as timber, and resin. Provisions and personal items of the crew were also recovered from the wreck, such as a gaming piece, a whetstone with Phoenician graffiti, and nuts and seeds. The Bajo de la Campana shipwreck belonged to Phoenician traders from the Eastern Mediterranean.[2]

Location and discovery[edit]

The Bajo de la Campana, located approximately 2.5 km (1.6 mi) offshore from La Manga del Mar Menorand is located around 20 miles Northeast of Cartagena, Spain[3]. Bajo de la Campana consists of three geological formations: Isla Grosa, El Farallón rock, and La Laja reef. La Laja, also known as the Bajo de la Campana, is a shallow reef rising from a depth of about 16 m (52 feet) to within 2 m (6.6 feet) of the water’s surface, making it a navigational hazard.[4] Shipwreck debris surrounding the Bajo indicates its historical danger. Other ancient shipwrecks at Bajo de la Campana include a Punic ship from the 2nd century BCE and a Roman ship from the 1st century CE.[5]

Archaeological material was first discovered at the site in 1958 by commercial scrap-metal salvaging salvage divers and later by recreational divers. The sport divers took exposed artifacts from the Phoenician shipwreck as souvenirs but soon after returned significant pieces that they found to authorities in 1979. [6]

The Spanish Ministry of Culture conducted inspections in 1972 and 1988, leading to the conclusion that the recovered artifacts represented three distinct shipwrecks from different periods: late seventh-century BC Phoenician, second-century BC Punic, and first-century AD Roman.[7] In 2006, the Institute of Nautical Archaeology (INA) initiated an investigation and formalized a cooperation with the Ministry of Culture of Spain in 2007. A survey conducted by INA in 2007 on the eastern side of the Bajo confirmed previous findings and indicated that most of the Phoenician ship wreckage remained buried beneath rocks, sediment, and seagrass. As a result, a full-scale excavation and study were launched in 2008.[8] The surveyed area measured approximately 20 m × 20 m (66 ft × 66 ft); it is bordered along its western edge by the sheer face of the Bajo de la Campana which contains a shallow cave in the northwestern corner, where many of the shipwreck finds were located.[7]

The Ship's Journey[edit]

The Phoenician ship at Bajo de la Campana was presumed to have been a trading vessel that was traveling from the Eastern Mediterranean to the Western Mediterranean. Due to the remains discovered, it is believed that this ship was carrying luxury items to be gifted or traded with indigenous people in exchange for land access.[5] Additionally, other items recovered were likely intended for Phoenician workshops along the coast pf Spain as well as further East.[3]

The presumed voyage of the ship found at the Bajo de la Campana shipwreck began towards the end of the seventh century BCE. It is believed that the ship set sail from a Phoenician port along the South coast of Spain and headed East. When the ship reached Cabo de Palos, a rocky spit of land that jetted out into the sea at the point where the Spanish coast turns Northward, roughly around present-day Cartagena, the ship came across a very strong Easterly headwind. This Easterly headwind forced the bow of the boat to point closer towards the shore, towards Cabo de Palos. Closer to the shore, the boat encountered many obstacles such as shoals and rocks such as Las Horrmigas, Isla Grosa, El Farallón Rock, and Bajo de la Campana.[4]The ship was able to navigate through all of the obstacles and dangers up to Bajo de la Campana by sailing a couple miles off shore. When the ship reached the Easterly part of the Bajo de la Campana Shoal, it encountered bad weather and ran aground, and large boulders on the seabed tore a large hole in the ship. Due to this extensive amount of damage, the ship sunk, along with the over four tons of cargo it was carrying, a short distance away from the shoal.[3]

Ship remains[edit]

Little has survived of the Phoenician ship. The remains of the ship and its cargo were concentrated primarily along the northern edge of the site, including the cave and crevice area. Most of the large fragments of the ship were quickly swept away by ocean currents, as only a few fragments of the ship's hull where discovered.[9] However, a large amount of smaller remnants of the ship and cargo remained in place at the shipwreck. Many of the smaller remains were trapped in a cave at the base of the shoal. Additionally, many small remains were all trapped between rocks at the base of the shoal and some pottery pieces were scattered around the seabed, held down by sediment.[10][9] The remains of the ship and cargo were scattered across 4,300 square feet of seabed.[3]

Excavations have yielded ballast stones used as weights to provide stability to the ship, dunnage material used to keep the cargo in place, and only one fragment of hull wood, likely softwood, measuring approximately 43 cm (17 inches) long, 11 cm (4.3 inches) wide, and 35 mm (1.4 inches) thick. This fragment preserves part of a scarf joint and most of one mortise, with a tenon peg hole.[7]

Cargo[edit]

Raw materials[edit]

The ship's cargo, predominantly consisting of raw materials includes 64 elephant tusks, with many bearing Phoenician inscriptions.[11] Readings of the ivory inscriptions identified at least two male personal names, as well as morphemes that may indicate the individuals’ rank or function.[7] Spanish archaeologist Fernando Lopez advances that the names are of the suppliers of the ivory.[12] Additionally, at least 11 of the elephant tusks bear religious Phoenician inscriptions. All of the religious inscriptions on the elephant tusks are votive in nature and include a declaration of piety to a god or a request for a blessing. Phoenician gods that are referenced on these inscriptions include the Phoenician goddess Ashtart and the god Eshmun. Due to their inscriptions, it is likely that these elephant tusks were intended to be deposited into a Phoenician shrine or sanctuary.[3]

The cargo also contained raw metals, including over a ton of lead ore, 154 plano-convex ingots of tin and thirteen of copper (mostly small and circular)[5][3], along with 10,000 galena nuggets used in silver extraction. The relatively small quantity of ingots suggests the shipment may have been tailored for a specific workshop rather than bulk supply. Additionally, various pieces indicating spillage and slag from metal smelting operations have been recovered.[7] Additional raw material findings include two small lumps of Baltic amber, logs of chopped wood, thick globs of dark resin, and an earthen material such as potting clay or red ochre.[7] Isotopic analysis conducted on the raw materials found at the shipwreck indicates that the ship’s cargo of metals was mined from many geological sources. Specifically, the lead came from Southeastern Spain, the tin from the Northwestern Mediteranean, the copper ingots from at least eight different regions in the Mediteranean region, ranging from southern Iberia to Sardinia and Cyprus.[3]

Manufactured goods and luxury items[edit]

Two elephant tusks with Phoenician inscriptions displayed on a white shelf.
Elephant tusks with Phoenician inscriptions from the Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck on display in Rome

The ship carried a diverse range of Phoenician pottery, including amphoras, plates, pots, bowls, tripod mortars, lamos, an oil lamp, and various jugs and pitchers. Among the amphoras found are Vuillemot type R-1 and Cintas type 268. Vuillemot type R-1, produced in colonial workshops in Spain and North Africa, was distributed widely from the Atlantic coast of Morocco to Sicily. Fragments of these amphoras from Bajo de la Campana indicate production in the region of Málaga. Cintas type 268 amphoras, with an ovoid shape, were produced in Phoenician settlements on central Mediterranean islands and along the North African coast, with limited distribution in the western colonies, mainly Ibiza and the Mediterranean coast of Spain. Also found were small ceramic bottles, or unguentaria, used for perfumed oils, with examples from Archaic-period sites being imports from Phoenicia proper. These bottles were widely distributed across southern Spain and were primarily used in the 8th century BC, with some continuing into the 7th century BC. The bottles discovered at the Bajo de la Campana likely date to the end of the 7th century BC.[13]

Excavations have revealed several exotic objects, including an ivory knife handle, double-ended boxwood combs, decorated ostrich eggs, ivory ring stand, a pin made of antler, a stone pedestal, an alabaster jar, a pale-green stone block, a bronze object, a gaming piece, and various bronze and wooden furniture elements.[4][9] The carved ivory knife handle, though slightly damaged, retains an elegant design and features a long slot for the blade tang and rivets. The wooden combs, broken and poorly preserved, are made from boxwood and decorated with simple linear patterns. The tripartite limestone pedestal stands 72 cm (28 inches) tall when assembled, with a column, a capital with volutes, and abacus. Another stone object is a pale-green stone block, likely a whetstone used for sharpening bronze and iron tools. A singular bronze object in the shape of a right forearm holding a stylized lotus blossom is possibly part of a ceremonial staff or other significant object.[14][3] A small stone cube was recovered which was thought to be a gaming piece. This gaming piece bears a Phoenician inscription on its surface which could be the name of the owner of the ship. [5]The bronze furniture elements include legs, corner fittings, and wooden pieces, likely parts of chairs, stools, or beds.[15] The bronze furniture remains suggest that this Phoenician ship was transporting a set of ornate furniture.[3] The varied array of goods in the cargo, including raw materials, manufactured goods, and luxury items, sourced from various geographical locations, suggest the ship's involvement in long-distance trade networks.[2][14]

Importance[edit]

The Phoenician shipwreck at Bajo de la Campana was the first potential Phoenician shipwreck between 850 and 600 BCE to be found, excavated and systematically studied in the Mediterranean region.[6] The cargo on this ship has provided important insights into the Phoenician's presence in Spain, specifically their trading networks and their workshops along the coast. [5] Additionally, the remains of the ship's hull allowed archeologist to analyze the structure and engineering of a Phoenician ship, which was a rare opportunity. On a larger scale this Phoenician ship shows the interconnectedness of the ancient Mediteranean as it carried goods from at least 12 different spread out locations in the Mediteranean. [3]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Delgado 2013.
  2. ^ a b Institute of Nautical Archaeology 2020.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Urbanus, Jason (2016). "Masters of the Ancient Mediterranean". Archaeology. 69 (3): 38–43. ISSN 0003-8113.
  4. ^ a b c Polzer, Mark; Pinedo, Juan (November 2012). ""The final season of the Claude and Barbara Duthuit Expedition to Bajo de la Campana, Spain: excavation of a late seventh-century BCE Phoenician shipwreck."". The Institute of Nautical Archaeology: 6–13.
  5. ^ a b c d e Archaeology, Institute of Nautical (23 February 2020). "Bajo de la Campana Iron Age Shipwreck Excavation". Institute of Nautical Archaeology. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  6. ^ a b Polzer, Mark (2012). "Strategies for Underwater Cultural heritage: The Case for the Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck" (PDF). Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  7. ^ a b c d e f Polzer 2009, p. 28.
  8. ^ Polzer 2009, pp. 27–28.
  9. ^ a b c Archaeology, Institute of Nautical (23 February 2020). "Bajo de la Campana Iron Age Shipwreck Excavation". Institute of Nautical Archaeology. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  10. ^ Polzer, Mark; Pinedo, Juan (November 2012). ""The final season of the Claude and Barbara Duthuit Expedition to Bajo de la Campana, Spain: excavation of a late seventh-century BCE Phoenician shipwreck."". The Institute of Nautical Archaeology: 6–13.
  11. ^ Antonelli et al. 2019, pp. 9–10.
  12. ^ López Pardo 2015, pp. 67–68.
  13. ^ Polzer 2009, pp. 30–31.
  14. ^ a b Polzer 2009, p. 33.
  15. ^ Polzer 2009, pp. 31–33.

Sources[edit]